Maharashtra crisis: Sharad Pawar warns of President’s rule


Maharashtra crisis: Sharad Pawar warns of President's rule
Image Source : PTI

Maharashtra disaster: Sharad Pawar warns of President’s rule

Nationalist Congress Party President Sharad Pawar on Friday warned of a spell of President’s Rule in Maharashtra except the warring Bharatiya Janata Party and Shiv Sena come collectively and kind the federal government.

“Time is short. The BJP-Sena must take steps to give the state a stable government. If they fail to do so, Maharashtra could face a spell of President’s rule which does not augur well for the state,” Pawar advised media individuals.

To a query, the 78-year-old veteran politician stated that neither the BJP nor the Sena has requested the NCP to affix their authorities.

“The peoples’ mandate is with them. We are prepared to sit in the Opposition. I cannot comment anything on the Governor’s stance, but feel he must initiate suitable steps in the matter,” Pawar stated reiterating his earlier stance.

Ranked among the many most politically secure states within the nation, in its 59-year historical past, Maharashtra has witnessed spells of President’s rule solely twice — for 112 days in Feb-June, 1980 and later for 33 days in Sep-Oct 2014.

On his assembly with Union Minister of State for Social Justice Ramdas Athawale, the NCP chief stated he had requested him (Athawale) to intervene within the matter since he enjoys a singular standing in nationwide politics.

“I had come to seek Pawar Saheb’s advice on how to resolve the crisis, given his standing as an experienced national leader and in the interest of the state,” Athawale stated.

In a associated growth, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis is more likely to tackle the media this night on the political imbroglio amid hypothesis that he might tender an apology to the Sena.

Late in October, he had just about sought to label Sena President Uddhav Thackeray a liar on the latter’s insistence for an understanding with the BJP to share the submit of CM and equitable power-sharing.



Source link

Reply