Justice Akil Kureshi on Sunday denied speculation that he had resigned from judicial services following a call of the Supreme Court Collegium to nominate him as Chief Justice of Tripura High Court as an alternative of Madhya Pradesh as determined earlier.
Speaking to The Indian Express, Justice Kureshi made it clear that he had not resigned, however refused to take additional questions.
The Collegium, comprising Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justices S A Bobde and N V Ramana, determined to advocate Justice Kureshi as Chief Justice of Tripura High Court on September 5.
It was a departure from an earlier determination of the Collegium on May 10 when it had really useful that Justice Kureshi be appointed as Chief Justice of Madhya Pradesh High Court.
However, the federal government referred the proposal again to the CJI with “accompanying material”. After contemplating these communications, the Collegium determined to reiterate its earlier advice with a modification that Justice Kureshi be appointed Chief Justice of Tripura High Court.
Following the choice, speculation concerning Justice Kureshi’s resignation from judicial services began doing the rounds.
With the Centre delaying the elevation of Justice Kureshi as Chief Justice of Madhya Pradesh High Court regardless of the Collegium’s advice, Gujarat High Court Advocates’ Association had moved the Supreme Court. Justice Kureshi was earlier hooked up to Gujarat High Court and is at the moment a decide at Bombay High Court.
President of Gujarat High Court Advocates’ Association, Yatin Oza, expressed disappointment over the Collegium’s newest advice to nominate Justice Kureshi as Chief Justice of Tripura High Court. He termed this “abject surrender” and mentioned the Collegium ought to have reiterated its earlier determination of recommending Justice Kureshi as Chief Justice of Madhya Pradesh High Court.
Oza mentioned that they might elevate the problem when the apex court docket hears their petition on Monday. He alleged that “signals” are being despatched to judges that if they offer orders “unfavourable” to ruling occasion, it should have penalties.
Among many rulings of Justice Kureshi at Gujarat High Court is an order to ship Amit Shah (now Union Home Minister) to a two-day police remand in reference to the Sohrabuddin Shaikh encounter case. Shah was later discharged from the case.
When Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court Justice Subhash Reddy was elevated to Supreme Court final October, Justice Kureshi was the seniormost decide within the High Court. The Collegium, nevertheless, really useful his switch to Bombay High Court.
Following the switch order, the advocates’ affiliation had referred to as for a strike. In the decision, the affiliation had mentioned, “The bar, upon detailed deliberation in its meeting held on November 1, 2018, unanimously finds no reason to justify his transfer from being seniormost puisne judge of Gujarat High Court to number five judge in the Bombay High Court ostensibly in the interest of better administration of justice.”