43comments Share Tweet Share Pin it Share Stumble Email HomeNational/InternationalHindus, whom People Considered as Pakistani Muslim (BBC Hindi) Hindus, whom People Considered as Pakistani Muslim (BBC Hindi) National/International By admin अपनी ज़मीन, अपना घर और अपनों को छोड़ कर किसी और मुल्क में जाना. नए सिरे से ज़ि… source Recommended For You Spain FM Alfonso Dastis: Changes could allow referendums – BBC News admin admin Write For Us Related Posts In Third Year, US Women’s Marches Turn To 2020 Elections admin PM Modi inaugurates KMP project, slams Congress govt for creating ‘obstacles’, ‘delaying projects’ admin 43 Comments anil chugh Hamare purkho ko bhi 1747 me pakistan ko sab kuch chhod kar aana pada … Haveliyo me rehne walo ko sone ke button daily kurta badalne walo ko raja maharaja jesi jindgi jine walo ka ek hi jhatke me sab kuch chhin Gaya … Reply February 11, 2019 Manish Kumar वो धर्म , धर्म नहीं जो इंसानियत को नष्ट करे। @इस्लामिक कट्टरपंथी Reply February 11, 2019 Asad ali Khan 3:20 pushtoon calture dance it's called attan…. Reply February 11, 2019 ENGINEERING PRODUCT. Manufacturing Love you. Reply February 11, 2019 imagine Mystery अकल्पनीय रहस्य Afagani muslim better then pakistan muslim Reply February 11, 2019 Decent Master Why aren't indians reading my comments, but just keep saying that they're all true pahstuns? Reply February 11, 2019 Nasajaaz O bekhabr o bekhabr de kana Reply February 11, 2019 Ahana Roy Hindus are such a non violent people 😢 don't know why they suffered that much and still suffering😭😭 Reply February 11, 2019 Viraj Jadhav Bhai Asli pathan toh hum Hindu 🇮🇳hai Reply February 11, 2019 Viraj Jadhav Proud to be an Hindu 🇮🇳🙏 Reply February 11, 2019 Pramod Tripathi Aap Hindustan me han..yehiKya kam hai Reply February 11, 2019 sadid ahmad poshtoon culture main koye hindu nahe hain poshton Musalman he hota hain or Musalman he rehta hain en logo nay poshto zuban seka hain par poshton nahe hosaktaPoshton ka mazak na banao Reply February 11, 2019 Decent Master They're not pahstuns. And for those who don't believe me, click on read more Because according to desis themselves(who have a great knowlegde of DNA and ethncity) says themselves they're just desi-migrants. Look: https://anthrogenica.com/showthread.php?16379-Hindu-Pashtuns-of-Pakistan Read all of it. Reply February 11, 2019 BHUVNENDRA singh Rajput hindu dharm ka piray tha auar 3000 sal say jyada akelay ladtay ladtay jad thka toa Hindu tbha hogya per ab samay aa gya hai Santan dharm koa bolandioa pay lay janay ka Reply February 11, 2019 BHUVNENDRA singh jai India may Kshatriyoa koa rajput boltay hai waisay afganishtan may Kshatriya koa pathan boltay thay Reply February 11, 2019 patel rajesh If male can do better thing according to Islam they will get 72 hoor(Maal in hindi) alchohol(tharra in hindi) and so many red alert things but when female will do better according to Islam what they will achieve…. Reply February 11, 2019 Rubul Hussain yai log afganistani nahi hai rajosthani hai Afghanistan mai Hindu nahi jutha video banaya hai. Reply February 11, 2019 Vab101 Can someone tell me what Tattoo is that (language and meaning) on 3:11 Reply February 11, 2019 Decent Master Nice trying to remove my comment about disproving all pahstuns being hindus. Nice try, hindus, nice try.But i won't stop. I like how hindus go all ape about every pahstun being indian and all pahstuns were once hindus.I'll admit there were hindu pahstuns, but to say all pahstuns were hindus is a lie(remeber, i speak for pahstuns only. Non-pahstun/(non-dardic) afghans were almost never hindus. SO no need to talk about them. Indians always say to pahstuns, who refuse anything remotely south asian(this, i can't accept. Although we aren't twins of punjabis or hindus, it doesn't mean we have a strong south asian thing going on about our identity, but i can talk about that later, if youtube doesn't remove my comment…again), keep mentiong they should check their history, AKA, wikipedia. But as they all keep mentioning that, many of them being so eager make this huga mistake: Ghandara is Kandahar. That's wrong, since according to wikipedia Ghandara was placed in the extreme north(around Taxila, Peshewar, maybe Kabul etc), and as i remember, Kandahar is the extreme south of Afghanistan.Here are some links from wikipedia about Ghandara: "Approximate boundaries of the Gandhara Mahajanapada, in present-day northwest Pakistan and northeast Afghanistan." ANd: "An alternative etymology derives the name of the city from Gandhara, the name of an ancient Hindu-Buddhist kingdom located along the Kabul and Swat rivers of Afghanistan and Pakistan; Kandahar is not in the former territory of Gandhara." https://www.ancient.eu/uploads/images/3943.jpg?v=1485681417 Kandahar: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Afghanistan_adm_location_map.svg Seems like indians like to just take some part of the context an make it seem like something else, just to make these weird claims. More from wikipedia: "The region is first referred to in the Achaemenid-era Elamite Persepolis fortification tablets. It appears again in the Old Persian, Akkadian and Aramaic inscriptions of Darius I and Xerxes I among lists of subject peoples and countries. It is subsequently also identified as the source of the ivory used in Darius' palace at Susa. In the Behistun inscription (DB 3.54-76), the King recounts that a Persian was thrice defeated by the Achaemenid governor of Arachosia, Vivana, who so ensured that the province remained under Darius' control. It has been suggested that this "strategically unintelligible engagement" was ventured by the rebel because "there were close relations between Persia and Arachosia concerning the Zoroastrian faith." Wait, there were close relations between Persia and Arachosia concerning the zoroastrian faith? The chronologically next reference to Arachosia comes from the Greeks and Romans, who record that under Darius III the Arachosians and Drangians were under the command of a governor who, together with the army of the Bactrian governor, contrived a plot of the Arachosians against Alexander (Curtius Rufus 8.13.3). Following Alexander's conquest of the Achaemenids, the Macedonian appointed his generals as governors (Arrian 3.28.1, 5.6.2; Curtius Rufus 7.3.5; Plutarch, Eumenes 19.3; Polyaenus 4.6.15; Diodorus 18.3.3; Orosius 3.23.1 3; Justin 13.4.22). Following the Partition of Babylon, the region became part of the Seleucid Empire, which traded it to the Mauryan Empire in 305 BCE as part of an alliance. The Shunga dynasty overthrew the Mauryans in 185 BC, but shortly afterwards lost Arachosia to the Greco-Bactrian Kingdom. It then became part of the break-away Indo-Greek Kingdom in the mid 2nd century BCE. Indo-Scythians expelled the Indo-Greeks by the mid 1st century BCE, but lost the region to the Arsacids and Indo-Parthians. At what time (and in what form) Parthian rule over Arachosia was reestablished cannot be determined with any authenticity. From Isidore 19 it is certain that a part (perhaps only a little) of the region was under Arsacid rule in the 1st century CE, and that the Parthians called it Indikē Leukē, "White India." Wait, Mauryan empire extended to Arachosia(modern day Kandahar) because the seleucid empire gave it to the mauryans?! Huh, fun that persian influence on Arachosia gets mention before the mauryan one(as the wikipedia site says: "The chronologically next reference to Arachosia comes from the Greeks and Romans, ", meaning after persians mentioning arachosians, the greeks are the next. And the mauryan empire first get mention in 305 BCE in the site, meaning they came after the Persians). More, regarding the mauryan empire in Arachosia: "While the Diadochi were warring amongst themselves, the Mauryans were developing in the northern part of the Indian subcontinent. The founder of the empire, Chandragupta Maurya, confronted a Macedonian invasion force led by Seleucus I in 305 BC and following a brief conflict, an agreement was reached as Seleucus ceded Gandhara and Arachosia and areas south of Bagram to the Mauryans. During the 120 years of the Mauryans in southern Afghanistan, Buddhism was introduced and eventually become a major religion alongside Zoroastrianism and local pagan beliefs." And local pagan beliefs don't mean hinduism. And deity/stone/statue worship weren't only practiced in Hindustan, but in the arab world and other places as well. Otherwise, they would had called it hinduism. Something interesting as well: "Arachosia retained Zoroastrian religious and cultural influence until the advent of Islam in the 7th century. Much of the country remained Zoroastrian even while in Arab hands, but within a few centuries Islam became the region's dominant religion." ANd yeah, i know that Arachosia gets called "white india" along with Helmand as well. But notice that the Mauryian empire came 120 years(305 BC) before Parthians(185 BC). That means that mauryans got 120 years to convert the locals from their former religions to buddhism. And i'm pretty sure the parthians considered buddhism as a part of the indian world(though buddhism and hinduism aren't the same. Only hindus are claiming this, no one else do, which makes indians more untrustfull about history and culture, time after time. Always claiming weird shit. It's your own fault, so don't blame me), hence they called it "white india". Some words from a wiki site regarding "hinduism in Afghanistan": "Before the Islamic conquest of Afghanistan, the territory was a religious sediment of Zoroastrianism (northeast), Paganism (south and east), Buddhism (southeast), Hinduism (Kabul/Logar) and others". Your own beloved wiki says this. The error about this is that it says zoroastrianism only existed in north east(kabul and balkh, where zoroastrianism originated from, by zoroaster), when Herat and Farah are way closer geographically to Iran(Persia) than Kabul and Balkh, and they're closer to eastern iranians, both culturally, genetically and look-wise than anyone else in AFghanistan, so it's clear their ancestors were zoroastrians as well. And again, hinduism isn't the only religion in the entire world, so paganism and hinduism aren't the same thing. But hindu pahstuns did exist, hence the sakawand temple in Logar( a pahstun majority district). Buddhism also existed in Badaskhshan(most northeastern post of Afghanistan, south of Tajikstan), so there are some errors. So i think the next time you gonna claim something, don't do it out of your own emotions/weird hindu-extrism ideas and also read from the sources, where you tak take sentences out of context just to make it look like something else. READ the whole source. And it won't help trying to remove my comment. I'm prepared this time, hindus. Soures: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kandaharhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arachosiahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism_in_Afghanistanhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gandhara Reply February 11, 2019 Be a civil servants For only upsc They should be protected .they are our brother and sisters Reply February 11, 2019 OWAIS AHMED Khan Pakistan is 2nd largest home for Hindus after India in the world Reply February 11, 2019 Domestic Chihuahua Afghanistan before Islam wasn’t Hinduism, Afghans are Buddhist and Zoroastrianism mixed Reply February 11, 2019 Domestic Chihuahua Islam may be growimg for now, but I see and believe that Pakistan will become Hindu again and will be more diverse and Beatiful than ever Reply February 11, 2019 pharma guts video Diversity is most beutiful ..Pakistan should be a secular state and accept diversity ..I think secularism is good for humanity .. Reply February 11, 2019 loknath prabhat All these things get tears in my eyes. How great was there sacrifice for us and now new generation dosent bother. Reply February 11, 2019 anonacc Okay.. so Pathans were originally Hindus you say? Reply February 11, 2019 aj k BBC news show wrong news Reply February 11, 2019 Anil Gupta ओशो महागीता के-91-प्रवचन ह!सभी को सुनने के साथ ओशो जो कह रहे है!उसको ठीक से समझ लेना चाहिए!समझ के साथ प्रयोग करना चाहिए!तभी शरीर-मन-बुद्धि-विवेक-साक्षी का प्रयोग करने से विकास होगा और आत्मा-होश-जागरण होगा! जीवन मे होश पूर्वक प्रयोग करें! osho.com Reply February 11, 2019 VIKASH kAUSHIK Bollywood Ke Rajkumar saahab (Kulbhooshan Pandit ) bhi to Balochistan se the….Jab unko itna pyaar de skte h to inhe bhi dijiye….Jai Hind Reply February 11, 2019 VIKASH kAUSHIK Nice people….Sweet language… Reply February 11, 2019 Gaming God I give my slaves the quran to wipe their asses with, I finally found a reason to use that shit book. Then I had to stop doing that because they said mohammad tried to rape them, while they were cleaning their ass. So I threw all my remaining toilet paper qurans into a pig pen, and fucking mohammad raped the pigs too. What else can you expect from an islamic pedophile small dick prophet that can barely satisfy his nine year old wife? Now for his sins, all muslim men are cursed with small dicks. What a sad religion shitlam is indeed. Reply February 11, 2019 Deepak Panwar India n Pakistan k 90% Muslims k purkhe hindu the.. 12th century k gulam vansh k period se mughal aurangjeb tak hinduo ka conversion hota rha.. khud mh Ali jinnah k forefather kathiavaad k hindu the yakin na ho to Google pe check karo.. Pakistan mai aise lakho Muslim h jo Rana.. Rajput. Gujjar. Jatt. Etc surname lagate h means inke purkhe hindu the jinko yatanaye dekar Muslim bnaya gya tha.. ye surname lagane wale bhi Pakistan mai hinduo par atyachar krte h. Reply February 11, 2019 I'm Allah I'm rasool Terrorism by Muslims Reply February 11, 2019 Ritesh Patel Hum wo cultured people hai jo sabhi ko perm se swekarte hai Muslims why scared every time everyday everywhere?if thay believe Allah is supreme power if Allah is truth then it's depends on ur sword? Then America have more powerful sword then what's about truth? U all Muslims can't understand Quran and prophet Mohammed… U all in influenced by power seeker Khalifa…. Who killed prophet 's Family and thay merge idiot interpretation with Quran for his selfish motiv…any religion can't be cruel like yadizi…understand Quran by heart not by mullahs…thay all are puppet of political motive Reply February 11, 2019 1.5 M dreams इनका पहनावा मुसलमानों जैसा नहीं है, इनका पहनावा इनकी परंपरा और संस्कृति जैसा है. जो ये मुसलमानों की बात की जा रही है वे सारे कंवर्टेड हैं, जो कभी हिंदू हुआ करते थे, बौद्ध हुआ करते थे Reply February 11, 2019 Digvijay Singh Rathore Love you pasthun hindu Reply February 11, 2019 Ashish Maurya Is problem ka reason British Bbc Finance by UKThis is a propaganda channel Reply February 11, 2019 durgesh srivastava we have to conserve their culture Customs and these peoples its duty of we Indian they are precius peoples Reply February 11, 2019 Lavedesh s Mere Hindu ekta unity nhi h varna Majaal thi kisi ki jo Mere pyare se vatan ki taraf kou dekh jata Reply February 11, 2019 Alikhan Ali Afghanistan me hindi nhai chalti Reply February 11, 2019 Basant Gupta Re bur Durand Rekha india_ Afghanistan ke bich Ka Rekha hai Reply February 11, 2019 Hanuman Prasad बहुत खूब बहुत अच्छा लगा पश्तून हिंदू वेरी गुड Reply February 11, 2019 Sampath Raj Aage badenge ekbaar aur sind aur baloochistan tak Hindu rastra banega. Modi sarkar. Reply February 11, 2019 Reply Cancel reply Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.